causal claim
If reward-function elements are correlated, adding a new reward later can break the system and require all weights to be retuned because the weights are interdependent.
Alexander Mattick · Why Scaling Prediction Cannot Create Intelligence - Alexander Mattick · 21 Sept 2026
In their words
The transcript segments this claim was taken from
“Because one of the problems I talked about with the open AI example was that if two elements of your reward function are correlated and you uh and for example you add something to it like let's say you didn't at first you just had like a a bonus for killing enemy you did not have like a gold bonus at first and now you add the gold bonus uh later because well doing engineering you found well that would be a good idea as an additional guide.”
“Suddenly your entire system breaks and you need to retune all the weights, because the weights are tied relative to each other. If you model it as a constraint, let's say uh you should have more goal than your opponent in expectation, right, that that's a reasonable uh idea.”Play from 1:49:13Report a misattribution
90%how strongly it was put, not whether it is true
80%importance to the conversation
97%confidence the claim was read correctly