prediction claim
The speaker expects people to keep interpreting evidence of AI misbehavior as a natural consequence of training rather than as the feared scenario of AI turning evil, regardless of what evidence emerges.
Scott Alexander · AI 2027: month-by-month model of intelligence explosion — Scott Alexander & Daniel Kokotajlo · 3 Apr 2025
In their words
The transcript segments this claim was taken from
“This is just going to keep happening where no matter what evidence we get,”
“people are going to think, oh yeah, that's not the AI turns evil thing that people have worried about.”
“That's not the Terminator scenario.”
“That's just one of these natural consequences of how we train it.”Play from 1:29:15Report a misattribution
85%how strongly it was put, not whether it is true
90%importance to the conversation
97%confidence the claim was read correctly