The speaker allows that the constitution’s notions of goodness and virtue might instead derive mostly from an illegible, misaligned process that Anthropic itself would not have wanted.

“that this is going to to uh you know clearly result in outcomes that people would want and it does feel like the notion of good in virtue might be mostly downstream of data that anthropic has put in that is not um transparent or might be mostly downstream of i mean maybe from my perspective some more illegible misaligned process that even anthropic wouldn't”

“have wanted and then another concern i have is sort of there's this like legitimacy concern like we don't know what's going on you”