Savlar4 sources healthy · latest episode 15 Oct 2026
descriptive claim

The speaker argues that adversaries and other safety-motivated actors have strong incentives and the ability to inspect AI activity and assess what safety measures are needed.

Thomas Larsen · AI 2040: Plan A report - Daniel Kokotajlo & Thomas Larsen · 8 Sept 2026

In their words

The transcript segments this claim was taken from

“other AI companies who have incentive to say like hey my competitor is being super unsafe other governments so like China has incentive to do this with U.S. labs U.S. you know government you know has incentive to do this with the Chinese AI companies sort of everyone who's an adversary or just is like wants to you know make sure that things are safe has this big incentive and now has the affordance to actually sort of look over what's going on what's you know what is sort of necessary to do safety and I think maybe one thing that's really topical here is like there's”
Play from 1:08:54Report a misattribution
80%how strongly it was put, not whether it is true
90%importance to the conversation
92%confidence the claim was read correctly