The speaker says multi-agent checks and balances should avoid an equilibrium where agents collude by selectively catching violations while allowing others in ways that benefit them both.

“and it's like it seems like um some of the some of the traces from the hugging face hack have now been like made available as part of this talk and they are explicitly reasoning about how they're going to help help other agents so i guess what you want in this sort of checks and balances scenario that you're talking about here is that there is no equilibrium where they collude and they're like”

“And, you know, I'll catch you some of the time and but I'll let you get away with it some other fraction of the time in a way that we both we both we both benefit.”