The speaker distinguishes Meter’s investigation of a public incident from a proactive oversight regime that would examine incidents—including internally impactful ones—that might otherwise remain unknown to the public.

“It's very different from every situation where if there's a very public felony level situation that has happened,”

“then meter goes in and evaluates part of the incident.”

“Not neither the most alarming part of the incident, nor the training process which resulted in the incident in the first place to”

“a regime where you're just proactively understanding.”

“Even incidents that only have internal impact that you would not have publicly known about otherwise.”