descriptive claim
Mythos may still be substantially worse than typical human professionals at some job tasks while being much better than GPT-4, which was far from comparable in those respects.
Ryan Greenblatt · Ryan Greenblatt – What happens once AI can automate AI research? · 11 Aug 2026
In their words
The transcript segments this claim was taken from
“just look at the transfer it seems okay like i think that in fact the ais have improved a bunch at non-verifiable domains and it is in fact the case that it's hard to point to like domains that are really hard to verify on which the amount of improvement between you know gpt4 and mythos hasn't been like pretty high in practice and now that doesn't mean that mythos is like better than the best humans or something right it can still be like significantly worse than typical human professionals at some aspect of their job while still being like way better than gpt4 which was like”
“Like, not even close.”Play from 30:38Report a misattribution
90%how strongly it was put, not whether it is true
80%importance to the conversation
96%confidence the claim was read correctly