The report evaluates model output across five dimensions: factual accuracy, citation accuracy, completeness, source quality, and tool efficiency.

“So yeah, so this is basically calling out the evals and the importance of structuring these.”

“So there's five dimensions they looked at.”

“So first one's factual accuracy.”

“So was the claim,”

“did the claim match the source?”

“Next one is citation accuracy,”

“which is a kind of a call out to the subagent that I mentioned over here, where we're checking the source and ensuring that the source supports the claim based off of what's being referenced.”

“Next is completeness. So are all aspects of the question being addressed?”

“Next is source quality.”

“So is it a good source or bad source?”

“primary source was high quality and the secondary source was less high quality and then the last one here is tool efficiency so did they call the appropriate tools at the right time in the right way so they measured all five of these as a as a way to evaluate the output from the model yeah”