opinion claim
The speaker believes the system's creators found a highly effective but non-trivial training method, while acknowledging that the speaker does not know how they trained it.
Alex Zhang · Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT · 2 Oct 2026
In their words
The transcript segments this claim was taken from
“you can train it properly and whether or not maybe you can mold some architecture around this system to make it really really good and that's something that like i mean i'm actively working on i guess but i think for them like they figured out a way to train the system which is completely non-trivial like i i actually don't really know how they did it and i've seen some comparisons online of you know some people are claiming they used quinn or they post train on top of quinn but”26:31Report a misattribution
0.90how strongly it was put, not whether it is true
0.80importance to the conversation
0.90confidence the claim was read correctly