For changes that cannot be automatically approved, teams are still deciding what humans should review and whether review should be line by line or combine the specification with other information.

“What is not really auto-approvable? And if it is not auto-approvable, is even in that world of something that has to be somewhat human reviewed, what do we review?”

“Are we still doing the line by line or are we doing some, some combination of the spec and... You know, I think this is... Yeah. Again, this is a whole separate question there as well, but-”