Readers may reject work that contains recognizable Claude-isms even when a human has invested substantial effort in ensuring its quality.

“You're still responsible for the quality, but then you get into this really funny thing where because of the Claude-isms, even just like silly, like, I don't know, there's like an em dash in the middle of the thing, right?”

“Like, people's brains trigger on this like, "Oh, no, I'm reading something that was written by Claude and not a human, and I'm, like, annoyed because I wanna be r- like reading a thing that was, like, fully produced by..."”

“Not necessarily fully produced by a human, but, like, that has the quality bar that the human would hold, right?”

“And so then we get into funny situations where maybe actually, like, the person did spend a lot of time making sure the thing was high quality, but they used Claude to help them, but tho- there's those little hints of Claude, and then the reader is, like, turned off, you know?”

“Mm. And, like, that's, like, unproductive as well.”