In the speaker's example benchmark, GPT 5.6 Sol achieved 95% correctness at an average cost of $6, while GLM 5.3 Flash achieved 93% correctness at $2; the speaker cautioned that the models were already slightly outdated because the field was changing quickly.

“These are, these models are now slightly older because the world's changing so fast. But the idea is basically, you know, we could see, okay, GPT five six Sol here was like ninety-five percent correct on this task set, but it costs six bucks on average, and GLM five three Flash was ninety-three percent and cost two bucks.”